Transparency/see thru a PLUS in speedos

[Byron]

Re. post#3, did he do the shower test? (must be a 10 rating I guess):
http://25.media.tumblr.com/bad614df4...x9s4o1_500.gif

[BrendanC04]

The picture in #4 is not a speedo nor a aussibum. It is in fact a Jockey Elance Bikini Brief. Please note the Black Tag which is associated with Jockey Elance.

[Byron]

Yes, it's pretty obvious that the guy is floating in his pool on an inflatable and in his white underwear - and a wet profile is being sought for a good pic. Afewgoodmen simply posted a photo - he claimed nothing about the name to be applied to what was being worn - although I am sure he will note your advice.

[Byron]

Strange - Jockey do not recognize that name* - but they do have a retro swimbrief (for which I would guess a transparency rating of 1):



*caveat emptor - alibaba nevertheless has them on its website but annotated "unverified supplier"

[Byron]

Forgot pic above: http://www.deadgoodundies.com/appare...ief-63249.html

[Crail]

Byron - Just checking - Elance is brief underwear - not swimwear

[Byron]

Yes, the thread was started off by afewgoodmen about SPEEDO transparency but then he posted a pic of UNDERWEAR, not swimwear. This was obviously not following the correct theme but if he wanted to illustrate some wet transparency on a similar garment , so be it.

All was left alone until an identification as to a black tab and the Jockey Elance underwear arrived from Brendan -
but I found that Elance is not on Jockey's underwear site anyway.

In order to come back to topic and whilst looking at the website I rated Jockey SWIMWEAR ( what little there is of it - ie retro speedos ) for transparency.