Speedo Fantasy Board - Mens Swim Suit Board - Briefs, Bikinis, and More  

Go Back   Speedo Fantasy Board - Mens Swim Suit Board - Briefs, Bikinis, and More > Mens Swim Suit Forums > General Mens Swim Suit Guy Talk
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2013, 05:10 PM
Swimmboy Swimmboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Yes, many jammers are so low you wonder about water going into the suit (tunneling) and slowing a swimmer down. A US college swimmer told me a few yrs. ago the jammers were better than briefs because the tight fabric around their thighs gave added support to thigh muscles that get tired quickly in a race. Also, many fabrics are slicker than human skin, so covering more of the body helps you be slicker (and faster?) in the water.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2013, 05:38 PM
50 Free 50 Free is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 114
Default

I don't think tunnelling is a performance thing... it isn't part of any competitive swimming that I know of. I do know that swimmers who show butt crack at a swim meet will be asked to fix that. We want to keep it PG. The rules call for appropriate swim wear, the meet referee is in charge of defining that. And they do! You know, there is a time and a place for exhibitionism, but teens doing it around little kids is not going to be allowed at a USAS event, trust me.. .
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2013, 05:46 PM
Byron Byron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,051
Default tired muscles

Yes, I can understand that they are appreciated by some athletes as jammers are in effect compression shorts, assisting with physical stamina.
What needs to be pointed out however is that the satisfaction of achieving a new personal-best time does not equate with a win in competition.
The runner has to break the line first and the swimmer still has to touch the wall first.
If the guy in the next lane is also wearing his best jammers in order to beat you (100% visible in most championship meets now) why don't we even it all up and just go back to speedos?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2013, 06:10 PM
Byron Byron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,051
Default lecture about tunneling

Whilst protecting the innocence of kids is an important issue I would point out that the word speedo was only used in this thread until jammers were introduced in post#6 - and then tunneling
(for which there is a separate thread on this forum)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-2013, 03:47 PM
50 Free 50 Free is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 114
Default

Well I guess when we see a championship performance happen by the wearer of a brief suit, your question might be asked of someone who can give a credible answer. Meanwhile the answer to the question whether less is better must be NO, obviously. For competitive swimming, that is. Ogling and drooling is another matter but for all you know some swimmers (or their parents) might not want to have their photos end up in such a discussion as these tend to... LOL ... do we really wonder why speedos aren't as popular as some wish they were? It's hilarious how an athlete's performance is rated by bulge and clarity through lining... In today's tech the most innocent little photo on facebook gets blown up and printed and viewed one handed all over the world.
Thanks for helping me figure this out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2013, 08:04 PM
skinnykid skinnykid is offline
Speedo Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 84
Default

It depends on the suit. Tech suits (they're really expensive) are faster than skin, so more fabric = faster. If not, skin is faster so more skin = faster. It just depends on the suit.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2013, 03:41 AM
Byron Byron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,051
Default pix

The strict specification led to limited results:

Red: http://www.aussiespeedoguy.net/speed...yredspeedo.jpg

Blue: http://25.media.tumblr.com/7ab536401...u6buo1_500.jpg

Oh yes, this guy should also explain himself (all at sea I think)
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/3...8cef7935d2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2013, 06:46 AM
NJHunkguy NJHunkguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 466
Default

I always like 1/2" less than 1" bikinis. Blue and red pictures clearly explained the reason. They are just looking fine, how they framed the male bodies.

Since I was a kid, recreational swimming, lessons, high school gym classes, I always wore 2", 2-1/2" Speedo type briefs. During the 90's 1/2" bikinis were widely available for purchasing usually by mail. I started collecting them even after 2000's.

My cruise photo above, those type of swimsuits were resembling Japanese fundoshi or styles of the exotic islands in the Pacific where men wore to fishing or dancing. The front coverage cloth slide along, you can control the amount of exposure. I have some interest on them. These type of special swimsuits were easily available from International Male/Undergear catalogs, where they stock specialty swimsuits wore and photographed by handsome male models.

But I don't really look good wearing 1/2" styles. Then came the Sunga/Aussiebum style square cut swimsuits. My point of view, about whether 3" to 4" or boxers or briefs, it got to do with "FASHION". Sunga cuttings are "IN" right now. They are looking great on a men, they are the trend.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All message content is the sole responsibility of the individual message poster.