Speedo Fantasy Board - Mens Swim Suit Board - Briefs, Bikinis, and More  

Go Back   Speedo Fantasy Board - Mens Swim Suit Board - Briefs, Bikinis, and More > Mens Swim Suit Forums > General Mens Swim Suit Guy Talk
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-22-2012, 12:21 PM
SwimTeamSpeedo SwimTeamSpeedo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 1,148
Default interesting the change

Watching the vidoe from 1972 (See Byron post above), it is interesting to see how much more brief the traditional Speedo suit has become. In the early 90's, (late 80's) the suits got real brief with the paper suit era. After that, male competitive swim attire made a big shift the other way. Funny that when Jammers and the more technical swim suits came along, the briefs appear to have not moved back toward the wider side seams.

On a side note, it is cool that more and more younger swimming guys are moving back to briefs( in my observation), at least for practice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-22-2012, 03:16 PM
Swimmboy Swimmboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 396
Default

Just because a picture shows up in an internet search for 'mark spitz speedos' doesn't mean it's Mark Spitz - in just the first four rows of pictures I saw one of Greg Louganis and one of Michael Phelps......

Gary Hall is the guy in a white USA tee-shirt - don't see a black 'tache' on him, though the video is rather poor....

About 'brief' suits reappearing - they never really left. Nearly every collegiate swimmer in the US practices daily in a brief Speedo (or other brand suit). During the regular season, most also compete in brief suits, saving the jammers for the big end-of-season meets where they strive for best times to try and qualify for the NCAA championships. I can't even count the number of college meets I have attended over the past 20 years as both a fan and a stroke/turn judge - and the brief suits are always the dominant suit until the final one or two meets.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-22-2012, 11:24 PM
Byron Byron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,051
Default response

post#17 + post#18 - quite agree

post#19 - stupidly missing the point again - I am quite aware of what Gary Hall looks like (father AND son if you wish to be pedantic) but is there any other swimmer, and particularly one with seven medals from 1972, with a black moustache?? If you want to believe the pic was photoshopped so be it.

Btw, if you want to enjoy MS's sense of humor look up what he said to Russian swim coaches about the advantages of his lip covering.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2012, 08:42 PM
Swimmboy Swimmboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 396
Default

"stupidly missing the point again" - please control your temper, Byron. We have had enough rude people on this board. Please take your nasty comments elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2012, 09:02 PM
Byron Byron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,051
Default no temper

...please insert a brain in your head to stop wasting space in this thread (which has been perfectly understandable without challenge from all other readers).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2012, 09:58 PM
SwimTeamSpeedo SwimTeamSpeedo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 1,148
Default fair point...

Disagreements are fine, in fact are healthy, but I also agree that using the phrase of "stupidly missing..." is over the top. Drop the "stupidly" and the statement makes the same point without the added insult (for which we all should have zero tolerance). In the grand scheme of things, whether it is Spitz of Hall is really not all that important to create this level of angst.

The last response post is just uncalled for and rude.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-24-2012, 11:00 PM
Byron Byron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,051
Default Note

A red herring of 1:20 was introduced in post #14 but I had not suggested 1:20 in the first place.
Another illogical challenge appeared in post#19 and thus stupidity does enter the equation whether you like the word or not.*

Take the "un" off "uncalled for" and refer to the attempt I HAD ALREADY MADE to bring the matter to a close in post#16 - and I agree with you that the argument is long past its sell-by date !

*Don't be such a drama queen - many such words of bold expression exist in the English vocabulary - and very much more enjoyable it is in the process
of their execution.
If such delicacy of temperament exists on this forum I hate to think what would result if I reproduced some of the freely expressed profanities to be easily found elsewhere on the 'net !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All message content is the sole responsibility of the individual message poster.