[sebbie]

Swimwear, Underwear, Straps, Thongs, Compression Wear and Skinny Jeans Try Ons

As my readers know, I am fascinated by all of these clothing items. For me, this fondness extends back to my teen years, and even before, when I first discovered how neat it was to wear clothing that fit snug in my groin area. Not long after I discovered that I was on a quest to find anything that I could wear that would make me feel good “down there”, a quest that continues to this day.

Previously I have talked in detail about the Christian Ocean YouTube videos, where generally he talks male acquaintances into trying on a swim brief or swim thong for the very first time and then wearing the garment to a public pool or beach. Everyone who watches these videos is secretly wondering how these “newcomers” are able to do that for the first time without getting a hard on, or worse, as in ejaculating in public. That the guys doing this are able to control themselves says that this is not their first encounters with clothing that fits snugly down there,

Many guys have this “love-hate” relationship with swim briefs and other forms of snug-fitting clothing, because of the dual fondness for the fact that such clothes make them feel horny and maybe indices an erection, but perhaps happening in an embarrassing place as in a public setting. So that is why many guys who are interested but wary like to do their try ons in private.

Currently, YouTube has lots of what I call try on videos, where guys try on a series of each of these items, swimwear, underwear of various types, jock straps, compression wear, and even jeans. YouTube seems to welcome these videos. Of course, YouTube does not allow frontal male nudity, but once covered with cloth, everything seems to be fine,

In the underwear try ons, of course, some brands and styles have pouches, and some do not. That means with respect to the video, the underwear with the pouches are OK with YouTube. And, of course, some guys are naturally bigger down there whenflaccid, which means that even flaccid, they fill out the pouch better. Or could the guy trying on the underwear be a naturally smaller guy and we are seeing a pouch filled out because the specific try on is giving him a decent sized erection? YouTube does not delve into that.

The sequencing of the underwear for the try ons is interesting too. In at least some of the videos there is an order, with the underwear with the most coverage and least snug fit coming first, and then sequentially the underwear gets smaller and tighter. This can be a path from boxer shorts with mid-thigh legs all the way to thong underwear with a g-string back. If I were doing this, I would tend to “grow” as each piece becomes tighter and skimpier than the last, so just getting myself into the thong as the final item would pose a great challenge. Watching another guy “struggle” with this phenomenon is most interesting.

Compression gear is the same deal, pretty much. The least confining item comes first and the stuff with the snuggest, most confining fit the last. And again, some compression gear have pouches and some not.

There seems to be general agreement on the part of posters that anything with cloth that covers the male genitalia is OK with YouTube, but the posters seem to be uncertain about what they can post that might show rear male nudity. Christian Ocean has posted many videos of the rears of males wearing swim thongs, and much of the thong rear consists of a strap that quickly disappears deeply between the butt cheeks. YouTube seems to have no issue with that. Indeed, guys at public beaches and pools showing up in a thong will be exposing half or more of their butt cracks.

The tricky part is the underwear try ons that include as options a strap or an underwear thing. Some of the posters claim that they cannot show the rear of an underwear thong they are trying on because of YouTube restrictions and many of the guys wearing the straps with zero coverage over the butt crack do not show the rear of the strap because YouTube will censor them, though a few go right ahead seemingly without YouTube cutting the video. Apparently what the rules are regarding straps and rear male nudity are still evolving.

The guys trying on skinny jeans are doing much the same thing, starting with the loosest fitting, least confining pair and working down to the most confining, snuggest fitting pair.

These kinds of try on videos generally do not show up on the explicit porn sites such as pornhub. Generally, the pornhub videos are filled with frontal nudity for both sexes. The try on videos would not be considered erotic enough. A video there might show a guy in a swim brief thong or similar underwear masturbating with the clothing item initially on, but then the item is removed and the guy ends up continuing in the nude and perhaps ejaculating onto, not into, the garment. I suppose that YouTube would censor any video showing the guy masturbating while wearing a swimming or underwear brief, even if there is no frontal male nudity. Some of the guys doing the try on YouTube videos use the videos to promote the fact that they also have an only fans site and YouTube video watchers should go there to see the more explicit parts that go beyond what can be shown on YouTube, and YouTube seems fine with this.

But, things have changed even on YouTube, especially with respect to subject matter, and there are lots of gay-themed videos—and some full-length movies that might not have been permitted years ago.

More generally, the rules regarding what the commercial broadcast stations could air or not were quite detailed and restrictive. However, as streaming has become the most common way to watch TV I notice that the ads supporting these services have become, well, blunter and more open. Charmin for some time has used the phrase “enjoy the go” to promote the softness of their bath tissue. The adds involving the cartoon bears needing to do a “number 2” have gotten more and more detailed and explicit. Then we have female passengers discussing what size tampon to use depending on the day in the period. Most recently I have seen an ad for the on line HIMS company asking if I am having difficulty getting and maintaining a hard-on to contact our company because then can help you do just that and thus achieve your goal! Would this ad be allowed on broadcast TV?

What next? Maybe a company engaged in the manufacturing of men’s swim briefs will begin the ad by saying “We know some of you when you try on our briefs for the first few times will tend to get a hard-on and perhaps even ejaculate. Be aware that once you get used to putting on and wearing our briefs, this problem will tend to lessen. We want you to be aware that for many guys this initial ‘reaction’ is perfectly normal, for most guys lessens once you get used to the idea of being in a brief in public and
want to make you aware that this should not deter you from purchasing and happily wearing our swimwear!”

And besides, the arousal is part of the fun!